Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with collision-detection
Search options not deleted
user 99481
Collision detection is the determination of whether or not two or more entities make contact with each other during gameplay.
2
votes
Accepted
Behavior after collision using masks overlap
So it appears as you are actually asking how to find the normal on an arbitrary pixel mask, this is actually simple.
One method you might think of using, is to simply use the pixel mask pixel as a A …
- 1,773
0
votes
1
answer
175
views
Time aware point -> capsule swept collision detection?
the simplicity of Minkowski sums are one of the big reasons capsules are used in collision detection, especially for player models. One of the benefits of this should be the ability to perform collis …
- 1,773
2
votes
Accepted
3D line segment AABB collision, with hit normal?
but I'm wanting to detect intersection with a 3D line segment (not an infinite ray) with a 3D AABB
Most of these ray intersection algorithms return the hit distance. All you need to do is check t …
- 1,773
0
votes
1
answer
2k
views
Swept 3d capsule intersection with AABB, what am I actually supposed to use to accomplish this?
I'm trying to figure out how to do continuous collision with a capsule (which would represent a collision volume for a player for example).
Given how common the capsule is in many game engines, and th …
- 1,773
2
votes
Accepted
2d side scroller slope physics and collisions
It's really no different than sloped 2d case
Consider the following picure.
In this instance, to move over the ramp you would just move using the slope of the ramp. Easy right? y = mx+b kind of stuf …
- 1,773