Timeline for How to ease toward a rotation limit, instead of stopping abruptly?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2019 at 17:40 | comment | added | tmighty | Perhaps you've read my other, long question. I think it is too broad. | |
| Feb 14, 2019 at 22:15 | comment | added | DMGregory♦ | I'm actually not sure whether that's needed or how to apply it correctly. I called it out in a comment to note my uncertainty, after my best guess at how to do it turned out to be wrong. ;) | |
| Feb 14, 2019 at 16:14 | comment | added | tmighty | Would you mind including that "adjustment for display resolution"? A generic idea would be great (as this is something that I'm currently fighting with). I feel that there's a lot to learn from you. | |
| Feb 14, 2019 at 16:07 | comment | added | tmighty | Yes, that fixed it. Your improved version of my script is really a beautiful kind of art. :-) | |
| Feb 14, 2019 at 16:07 | vote | accept | tmighty | ||
| Feb 14, 2019 at 15:53 | comment | added | DMGregory♦ | The meaningful range for a falloff multiplier is 0 < multiplier < 1. It's not expected to give a meaningful value at or above 1.0. I did forget to remove the "1 - ..." when simplifying the Lerp to a multiply, so try it without that. You'll likely want a low falloff value, close to zero. | |
| Feb 14, 2019 at 15:52 | history | edited | DMGregory♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Removing unnecessary 1 -
|
| Feb 14, 2019 at 15:29 | comment | added | tmighty | Here's a video of my results: youtu.be/_FxjEXx4B-Y | |
| Feb 14, 2019 at 15:25 | comment | added | tmighty | Could you please test the following? Set Yaw Input Falloff to 0.95f and observe. There is almost no drift happening if there is no more input. Now set Yaw Input Falloff to 1f. You'll probally notice that now there's a huuuuge drift happening. Can you reproduce this? | |
| Feb 14, 2019 at 5:03 | history | answered | DMGregory♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |