Timeline for Can I legally remove the default Unity splash screen by removing it from the APK?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 8, 2016 at 2:24 | history | protected | CommunityBot | ||
Mar 17, 2016 at 1:14 | answer | added | Ranjith | timeline score: 0 | |
Mar 13, 2016 at 5:07 | answer | added | rataplan | timeline score: 0 | |
Mar 11, 2016 at 12:46 | comment | added | Artur Czajka | Why are you ashamed of using Unity? | |
Jul 29, 2015 at 8:35 | answer | added | Stuart Wilson | timeline score: -1 | |
Aug 26, 2014 at 14:43 | answer | added | Dono1 | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 18, 2014 at 16:50 | comment | added | jhocking | The default splashscreen is only required for Unity Free. I am 100% certain those Unity console games were using Unity Pro, and the splashscreen isn't required on Unity Pro. Look at the license comparison here, and refer to 'Custom Splashscreen' unity3d.com/unity/licenses | |
Mar 18, 2014 at 4:58 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackGameDev/status/445786276558819328 | ||
Mar 18, 2014 at 4:04 | history | edited | Trevor Powell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Edited for ease of reading.
|
Mar 18, 2014 at 3:30 | history | edited | user1430 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 444 characters in body; edited title
|
Mar 18, 2014 at 3:26 | vote | accept | David Dimalanta | ||
Mar 18, 2014 at 3:21 | answer | added | user1430 | timeline score: 59 | |
Mar 18, 2014 at 3:21 | answer | added | David Dimalanta | timeline score: 13 | |
Mar 18, 2014 at 3:14 | comment | added | user1430 | It would be against the license agreement; it would not necessarily be a copyright violation. It depends on the terms of the license. | |
Mar 18, 2014 at 3:02 | comment | added | David Dimalanta | I see. That means, if I customized the Unity splashscreen, it will be against the copyright and thinking I'm the founder of Unity and used to make this game, right? | |
Mar 18, 2014 at 2:58 | comment | added | user1430 | You'd need to consult the Unity license for the answer; I doubt it's permissible, and the cases you're thinking of probably either got a special exemption or were allowed to display the logo/attribution elsewhere. | |
Mar 18, 2014 at 2:27 | history | asked | David Dimalanta | CC BY-SA 3.0 |