Timeline for Fuzzy State Logic or Finite State Machine for AI
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2013 at 3:16 | vote | accept | Matthew Pigram | ||
| May 29, 2013 at 6:08 | history | edited | Attackfarm |
edited tags
|
|
| May 28, 2013 at 8:14 | comment | added | Philipp | @MatthewPigram When you are not yet sure about the definition of fuzzy and finite state machines and your intention is to learn more about this through this question, you should first try to get a deeper understanding of the terms, maybe through asking specific questions about each. This will help you to make this question more specific, and avoid making it drift into gorilla vs. shark territory. | |
| May 28, 2013 at 7:28 | answer | added | Attackfarm | timeline score: 7 | |
| May 28, 2013 at 7:18 | comment | added | Matthew Pigram | fuzzy state logic is what I meant, I always thought that they were separate. Fuzzy was capable of being partially in several "states" as far as my research has lead me to believe whilst Finite is more singular and focused? | |
| May 28, 2013 at 7:16 | history | edited | Matthew Pigram | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited syntax errors
|
| May 28, 2013 at 7:15 | comment | added | Attackfarm | What's more, I'm not sure you're going to get the answer you're looking for. More specifically, I'm not sure the two methodologies are as distinct as you believe them to be. | |
| May 28, 2013 at 7:11 | comment | added | Philipp | There are different conflicting definitions for "Fuzzy State Machine". Please be a bit more precise about what you mean. | |
| May 28, 2013 at 7:06 | history | asked | Matthew Pigram | CC BY-SA 3.0 |