Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 27, 2013 at 9:08 comment added aKzenT Thanks for your help! You actually helped me a lot with the statement that I need more parameters for the projection, which triggered the research.
Apr 26, 2013 at 22:18 comment added Seth Battin @aKzenT I'm glad I helped you get there, but I really didn't answer your question at all. Besides, you obviously do the kind of work and research that we wish every questioner would do here. So I would hate to steal your opportunity to log a self-answered question. P.S.: cool article; thanks for posting it.
Apr 26, 2013 at 22:07 comment added aKzenT I think I found the solution. It's called a pinhole camera model, like described here: epixea.com/research/multi-view-coding-thesisse8.html If you want, you can edit your answer and I'll accept. Thanks for the help!
Apr 26, 2013 at 20:59 comment added aKzenT Please see my edit. I think maybe I found the missing "plane" hidden in another parameter. What do you think?
Apr 26, 2013 at 20:16 comment added aKzenT The View Matrix I calculate myself from the known world coordinates and rotation in space. So no hidden FOV there..
Apr 26, 2013 at 20:14 comment added aKzenT I should mention that the View matrix I have represents a real camera, not a virtual one. So I'm not sure how the concepts of a near and far plane apply to this. They would be 0 and infinity. Besides, the existing code works, I just don't know why...
Apr 26, 2013 at 18:42 comment added Seth Battin @msell sure, they might have a hidden unity in there. I would look for the FOV in that view matrix first.
Apr 26, 2013 at 18:03 comment added msell I think they do define a FOV of atan(1/1) * 2 = 90°.
Apr 26, 2013 at 16:02 history answered Seth Battin CC BY-SA 3.0