Timeline for Is a sequential update method really acceptable and is there a sane alternative?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2018 at 8:16 | vote | accept | Wingblade | ||
| Feb 9, 2018 at 23:58 | history | edited | Wingblade | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Condensing and summary question
|
| Feb 9, 2018 at 23:36 | comment | added | Wingblade | @Charanor It is a rant at least in part, yea. It's already heavily shortened in terms of information. I'll add a summary question and see if I can format things down without losing essential information. Thank you for your input. | |
| Feb 9, 2018 at 23:27 | comment | added | Charanor | I'm not really sure if this is a question, a rant, or a blog post. I think it would help to clear this question up, probably shorten it quite a bit to only required information, and add a clear question. As it stands right now I (and possibly others) have a hard time figuring out what the actual question is. | |
| Feb 9, 2018 at 23:11 | answer | added | user1430 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 9, 2018 at 22:28 | history | asked | Wingblade | CC BY-SA 3.0 |