How would I go about determining the difference in cost between changing the render color of an object every frame vice changing the texture (same sheet, just changing the source rectangle) every frame?

I ask because right now i'm changing the alpha every frame on about 300-400 objects, and i'm wondering if it isn't cheaper to just simulate that with a couple of frames and cycling through them.

  • \$\begingroup\$ I believe changing the sprite's vertex colors is way faster than swapping textures :) \$\endgroup\$ – Grimshaw Jul 24 '14 at 15:55
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ The fastest way is to try it - just spawn few thousands of objects. (be sure to share your answer). Last time I solved this using uniform in shader but never checked if it is the fastest way. \$\endgroup\$ – wondra Jul 24 '14 at 16:44

i do believe changing the color would be much less resource intensive, however the performance depends more on the number of different textures used.

check out this article for a few good bits of ingenuity when it comes to managing textures and performance


my take aways were pretty obvious:

  • to get best performance load your textures from the disk to memory into objects once, then access them
  • you may see performance increase (hardware dependent) by sorting those objects to draw all similar textured objects together.

as long as your only loading the X textures once and not X textures once for each N objects i think your test should prove worth while.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.