I'm working on a falling blocks type of game with triangular pieces. I'm using a SpriteBatch to accumulate and remember the pieces and their locations.

The problem is that when I rotate a scaled Image of the triangle, I get unexpected results, that is the origin of the sprite rotation is wrong -- but if I rotate a full-size image (no scaling) it works fine. The sprite should rotate from the center of the image (x + xScale * imgWidth / 2) and (y + yScale * imgWidth / 2). When xScale and yScale == 1, everything is fine. But as soon as it scales down to a fraction of the original size, the origin seemingly freaks out to weird sizes. Here's some code to inspect:

function love.load()
    img = love.graphics.newImage("triangle.png")
    sb = love.graphics.newSpriteBatch(img, 1024)
    imgWidth = img:getWidth()
    imgHeight = img:getHeight()
    x = 250
    y = 250
    xScale = 0.4
    yScale = 0.4
    xOrig = (xScale * imgWidth / 2)
    yOrig = (yScale * imgHeight / 2)
    angleDirection = 0
    id = sb:add(x, y, math.rad(angleDirection), xScale, yScale, xOrig, yOrig, 0, 0)

function love.update(dt)
    if love.keyboard.isDown(" ") then
        angleDirection = angleDirection + 180
        if angleDirection >= 360 then
            angleDirection = 0
    sb:set(id, x, y, math.rad(angleDirection), xScale, yScale, xOrig, yOrig, 0, 0)

function love.draw()

Now, to see the problem in action, run the preceding code. Change the xScale and yScale to a 1 to see the rotation work properly. Thanks in advance for any suggestions you have.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Have you tried not scaling the origin of the texture? It may be internally scaling it already in which case you are double doing it. \$\endgroup\$
    – RobCurr
    Mar 21, 2013 at 21:17
  • \$\begingroup\$ I hadn't thought of that, but will try it out when I get home. Thanks for the suggestion. I'll report back soon. \$\endgroup\$
    – C. Griffin
    Mar 21, 2013 at 22:03
  • \$\begingroup\$ That actually worked! I was overthinking it, and for some reason it never dawned on me to not scale the origin. If you "answer" my question, I can boost your rep by voting your answer as correct. Thanks again! \$\endgroup\$
    – C. Griffin
    Mar 21, 2013 at 23:26

1 Answer 1


When setting the origin of a scaled image, use the original dimensions of the image instead of the final scaled size. For instance to set the origin to the center of a 200x200 image, you would use 100x100 even if it is scaled as the 'add' and 'set' functionality scale those values internally.

Glad I could help ;)


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .