Timeline for Maximum audio delay before the player notices?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Apr 8, 2022 at 4:24 | history | suggested | dolgom | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fix the wrong link
|
| Apr 7, 2022 at 2:38 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 8, 2022 at 4:24 | |||||
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:15 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| S May 6, 2016 at 15:27 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Updated the ATSC link to the Jones report (I fixed the same reference on wikipedia as well)
|
| May 6, 2016 at 14:02 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 6, 2016 at 15:27 | |||||
| May 21, 2014 at 8:51 | history | edited | Heckel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added details about the informations
|
| S May 21, 2014 at 8:24 | history | suggested | Kostas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
OP is looking for a simple rule of thumb (which the references provide). The prologue of this answer is not contributing anything.
|
| May 21, 2014 at 8:23 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 21, 2014 at 8:24 | |||||
| May 15, 2014 at 6:12 | comment | added | Heckel | Wikipedia says 45ms, but it isn't necessarily the most reliable source. The second source says 185.19 ms and the third 125ms until it becomes noticable. Can you quote the source to help me understand where I am wrong ? | |
| May 15, 2014 at 0:25 | comment | added | mrr | Where do you get 150ms? Your sources clearly average around 45ms. | |
| May 14, 2014 at 5:05 | vote | accept | edA-qa mort-ora-y | ||
| Jul 11, 2016 at 5:51 | |||||
| May 13, 2014 at 21:21 | comment | added | Andon M. Coleman | I can tell you from personal experience that this even varies between ears in the same person. I have a rare vestibular condition that actually causes my brain to process auditory stimulation in my left ear measurably delayed vs. the right ear. On a bad day this causes dizziness, but most of the time it is tolerable. So yes, this is extremely subjective. | |
| May 13, 2014 at 20:46 | comment | added | Heckel | You are right, I completely misunderstood. Thank you. (I edited) | |
| May 13, 2014 at 20:46 | history | edited | Heckel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected a mistake that has been pointed out in the comments
|
| May 13, 2014 at 20:35 | comment | added | Peteris | "If you have a delay, it should be the video that is delayed." seems that it should be reversed, the ATSC article clearly states that people expect/tolerate sound happening a bit after the sight (since in real life sound lags sight by approx. 1 ms per foot of distance), but don't associate events properly if video event happens after the sound. | |
| May 13, 2014 at 19:00 | history | answered | Heckel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |