Timeline for Static "LoD" hack opinions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2016 at 19:17 | comment | added | Cobertos | @NathanReed You're the best! | |
| Oct 28, 2016 at 17:15 | comment | added | Nathan Reed | @Coburn Yep, updated the link. | |
| Oct 28, 2016 at 17:15 | history | edited | Nathan Reed | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
updated link
|
| Oct 28, 2016 at 16:59 | comment | added | Cobertos | Link broken :c, do you by chance have a mirror? | |
| Nov 28, 2011 at 12:15 | comment | added | Kevin Reid | @DavidLively I would think you would get swimming then, because there is nothing like a 1-cell shift which fits a rotation (until you get to 90°), so you would have to make a "circular" mesh rather than one that fits the view frustum. | |
| Nov 27, 2011 at 22:21 | comment | added | 3Dave | @KevinReid it does; the mesh just follows it. | |
| Nov 27, 2011 at 20:06 | comment | added | Kevin Reid | @DavidLively You’re lucky to have a situation that you can do this — in particular, that your camera apparently doesn't rotate. | |
| Nov 27, 2011 at 7:25 | vote | accept | 3Dave | ||
| Nov 27, 2011 at 7:24 | comment | added | 3Dave | Thanks for the link. I've managed to eliminate the "swimming effect" by tacking the mesh in place and resetting it relative to the POV whenever the camera moves one cell. The mesh lines up so there's no popping, it looks static so there's no swimming, and I still don't have to regenerate anything. Looks cool; kinda feels like cheating. | |
| Nov 25, 2011 at 18:49 | history | edited | Nathan Reed | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
add reference to CryEngine water
|
| Nov 25, 2011 at 18:41 | history | answered | Nathan Reed | CC BY-SA 3.0 |