Timeline for Intel GPU running faster than Nvidia GTX 1060
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2018 at 11:35 | vote | accept | Twarit Waikar | ||
| Jul 2, 2018 at 8:42 | comment | added | Twarit Waikar | I am doing 2 float multiplications and 1 vec2 subtraction in my shaders as a whole. But as the answers are suggesting, this seems to be normal to get lower frame rates with less workload. | |
| Jul 2, 2018 at 5:59 | comment | added | Kromster | "My shaders are under 60 lines of code" - add that to the question please. 60 lines of shader code could contain something weird | |
| Jul 2, 2018 at 5:40 | answer | added | Maximus Minimus | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 2, 2018 at 0:05 | comment | added | Charanor | Could be lots of things... I'd guess that the GPU has a high start-up cost. Think of your GPU vs CPU as a backpack vs a truck. The truck (GPU) can definitely carry more items than the backpack (CPU) but if you only have a pen and some paper it's easier to put it in a backpack than to start the trucks engine, open the doors, hire a driver etc... So basically your CPU might outperform your GPU on these simple calculations but if you were to say draw 6 mil quads your GPU would outperform your CPU. | |
| Jul 1, 2018 at 22:05 | history | asked | Twarit Waikar | CC BY-SA 4.0 |