network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 2 years, 2 months |
| seen | Mar 2 '11 at 14:22 | |
| stats | profile views | 17 |
|
May 31 |
awarded | Notable Question |
|
Dec 5 |
awarded | Self-Learner |
|
Sep 4 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Mar 3 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Mar 2 |
awarded | Teacher |
|
Mar 2 |
answered | Easiest, most fun way to program 2D games? Flash? XNA? Some other engine? |
|
Mar 2 |
comment |
Easiest, most fun way to program 2D games? Flash? XNA? Some other engine? What's the performance? what IDE can I use? |
|
Mar 2 |
awarded | Student |
|
Mar 2 |
comment |
Easiest, most fun way to program 2D games? Flash? XNA? Some other engine? Well, my point is that I wouldn't use them, and therefore the tools are useless. They keep crashing on me in addition to their bad UI / general feel. What if it turns out that they miss a certain feature? Even if they were open source, I wouldn't want to go anywhere near those codebases. Seems harsh, but I really just want some relaxed programming, and FRB seems like a fruitcake of frustration. Just imagine: I tried the particle editor and couldn't even find the button to open an image file. Which is arguably the single most important feature everything else builds upon. |
|
Mar 2 |
asked | Easiest, most fun way to program 2D games? Flash? XNA? Some other engine? |
