Reputation
Top tag
Next privilege 15 Rep.
Flag posts
Badges
3
Impact
~238 people reached

  • 0 posts edited
  • 0 helpful flags
  • 0 votes cast
Sep
24
awarded  Autobiographer
Apr
25
awarded  Editor
Apr
25
revised DRY 0-bandwidth-overhead-serialization in C#: virtual, delegates or reflection?
Corrected mistaken description of boxing per Andrew's correct comment
Apr
25
comment DRY 0-bandwidth-overhead-serialization in C#: virtual, delegates or reflection?
@Andrew: good catch, I misunderstood C#'s boxing/unboxing mechanism. Updated the question to reflect your correction.
Apr
25
comment DRY 0-bandwidth-overhead-serialization in C#: virtual, delegates or reflection?
@Sean: What do you mean by "if I need it for something"? (Every byte written to every successfully delivered packet will be read, if that helps clarify)
Apr
25
comment DRY 0-bandwidth-overhead-serialization in C#: virtual, delegates or reflection?
@Philipp: The question was originally posed on stackoverflow with the "no additional bandwidth" requirement omitted -- some programmers gave me some good solutions that all seemed to increase bandwidth, so I thought gamedev might be more performance-conscious.
Apr
25
awarded  Student
Apr
24
comment DRY 0-bandwidth-overhead-serialization in C#: virtual, delegates or reflection?
Are long questions automatically bad? I think I expressed all the relevant information pretty concisely -- how else could I get the problem across concretely?
Apr
24
asked DRY 0-bandwidth-overhead-serialization in C#: virtual, delegates or reflection?