Reputation
Top tag
Next privilege 20 Rep.
Talk in chat
Badges
1 3
Impact
~3k people reached

  • 0 posts edited
  • 0 helpful flags
  • 0 votes cast
Jul
3
awarded  Notable Question
Mar
1
awarded  Popular Question
Feb
6
comment 3-in-a-row or more logic
This got me on the right track. I wouldn't actually "destroy" them right when I found two previous matches, but I mark them for destruction. Then when I'm finished I loop back through and destroy everything that was marked for destruction.
Feb
6
awarded  Scholar
Feb
6
accepted 3-in-a-row or more logic
Feb
6
comment 3-in-a-row or more logic
Related yes, but like I said it's not robust. It only accounts for 3 in a row and not more.
Feb
6
awarded  Student
Feb
6
asked 3-in-a-row or more logic