network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 3 months |
| seen | Feb 18 at 17:46 | |
| stats | profile views | 0 |
|
Feb 6 |
comment |
3-in-a-row or more logic This got me on the right track. I wouldn't actually "destroy" them right when I found two previous matches, but I mark them for destruction. Then when I'm finished I loop back through and destroy everything that was marked for destruction. |
|
Feb 6 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Feb 6 |
accepted | 3-in-a-row or more logic |
|
Feb 6 |
comment |
3-in-a-row or more logic Related yes, but like I said it's not robust. It only accounts for 3 in a row and not more. |
|
Feb 6 |
awarded | Student |
|
Feb 6 |
asked | 3-in-a-row or more logic |
