Game Development Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional and independent game developers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've googled this and haven't come up with anything. Can I create a Pac-Man game and not get in trouble with?

Like can I sell it, and be able to make money without having to pay someone else royalties?

share|improve this question

closed as off topic by Byte56, bummzack, Nate, Anko, ClassicThunder May 2 '13 at 1:35

Questions on Game Development Stack Exchange are expected to relate to game development within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

NO. SO says – Dialock May 1 '13 at 18:31
1. Maybe you should post this on a Stack Exchange site that has to do with law; it's more related to law than it is game development. 2. How does this have anything to do with c++? – Doorknob May 1 '13 at 18:32
I just needed to know. I was going to create it in C++ ;) – Jordan May 1 '13 at 18:53
If a specific game is public domain or not is too localized in my opinion. Voting to close as too localized, and -1 for lack of basic research. – Byte56 May 1 '13 at 23:30
In the related questions we have the very popular Should that be closed for being too localized too? – Jeff May 2 '13 at 1:30
up vote 9 down vote accepted

In 2011, Namco sent a DMCA notice to the team that made the programming language Scratch saying that a programmer had infringed copyright by making a Pac-Man game using the language and uploading it to Scratch's official website.[94]

Considering they sent a DMCA to someone who wasn't making money off of it I'm going with no.

share|improve this answer
Okay thanks. I guess I'll look into something else. Thanks again ;) – Jordan May 1 '13 at 18:36

Pac-Man is still covered by copyright, and has not reverted to the public domain.

Exhaustively sourced proof:

  1. Copyright for works created during or after 1978 lasts a bare minimum of 70 years. (section 302.a) (In the case of Pac-Man, 120 years is probably a more likely duration, as it presumably would have been a work for hire performed for Namco by its employees. But we'll assume the minimum of 70 years for the rest of this proof)
  2. Pac-Man was created in 1980.
  3. At the time of writing, the year is 2013
  4. 2013 - 1978 = 35
  5. 35 < 70

Therefore, Pac-Man is still covered by Copyright.

Quod erat demonstrandum

share|improve this answer
Not to be too picky, but you might want to check your maths again. – DaleyPaley May 2 '13 at 4:24
It was, alas, a natural confusion, as I wrote this response whilst sitting comfortably within the decadent confines of my time machine, ten years hence. ;) – Trevor Powell May 2 '13 at 5:12
Hehe, I thought it was something like that ;) – DaleyPaley May 2 '13 at 5:19

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.