Take the 2-minute tour ×
Game Development Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional and independent game developers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I saw the general level design question but not much of it applies to building good solid levels for RTS games. Where can i find information on rules and mechanics of RTS level design?

share|improve this question
    
Resources or tips? –  thyrgle Aug 8 '10 at 5:02
    
Community wiki this? –  The Communist Duck Aug 8 '10 at 18:24
1  
Singleplayer or multiplayer? The two are drastically different. –  ZorbaTHut Aug 10 '10 at 7:27
    
@Zorba: Multiplayer. –  RCIX Aug 13 '10 at 1:52

5 Answers 5

up vote 7 down vote accepted

Balance (usually symmetry) so that you don't get an unfair advantage by a random spawn point

Allied to this is having a big enough map with enough different start points so that there is an element of FUD at the beginning of the game: 'Where is he?', and the chance to use different strategies such as redeploying bases. It is fine to have a couple of football pitch type maps to learn the game but the whole fog of war/element of surprise is key to RTS games; it rewards reconnaissance and builds suspense.

Defensible positions. Narrow passes, bridges that you can take and hold

Some goal in the no man's land that encourages you to come out of your base to seize the initiative such as taking the high ground, capturing buildings, controlling resources, gaining technology.


Here is an interview with a professional RTS level designer, excerpted from the book Game Level Design By Edward Byrne:

http://books.google.com/books?id=iX3oWHNf9hMC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA166#v=onepage&q&f=false

share|improve this answer
    
Unfortunately you seem to have picked one of the pages that's unavailable to view :( –  RCIX Aug 8 '10 at 23:24
    
Page 166? The link works for me. Maybe it's a UK thing? Try .com books.google.com/… –  Bob Hazard Aug 9 '10 at 5:28

Symmetry is good for balance but I have two things to add:

  • If you make the different sides of map symmetrical, do this with things that matter for gameplay (such as size and passability of areas) but try to vary the different sides visually where possible (such as different textures and props, using mountains as blockade on one side but buildings on the other). This brings more variety in the map to make it more interesting.

  • Or to take it further, you could try making maps not symmetrical, while still maintaining the balance by compensating disadvantages with advantages. This is much harder though.

Oh, and sometimes people want to play maps that are fun, and not necessarily balanced at all. It can be interesting to play against a friend "with one hand strapped to your back".

share|improve this answer

http://theussner.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/rts-level-design-the-layout-part-1/#comment-28

This link is to a German (in English) game designer's blog. He has only done part 1 so far but makes some good points as to how RTS map's should be conceptualized. Leaving some comments will no doubt encourage him to complete the series on RTS map design.

share|improve this answer

I actually disagree with the 100% even game.

Games such as travian and tribalwars demonstrate a bad example of unevenness. Your position almost completely determines whether you will live or die in the first few weeks.

However if your game is just a team vs team game, which will only go for half an hour to an hour, then you will find that having a randomly generated situation is sometimes quite fun (although it must not be too unbalanced).

The "Pro's" at the game, will be excited by the idea of winning even if it was unfair for them, and when it is easier for them, well big deal, its only half an hour.

The not noobs or pro's people will thrive when advantaged, and learn more when disadvantaged.

And the noobs will enjoy a higher success when it is an easier situation, but will have the excuse of "well i'm still learning" when they get flogged.

This works especially well, when people are matched up to someone of a similar "Level" or "Experience"

...

Just my 2c

share|improve this answer
1  
I'm fairly sure that you have never, ever, even met a "pro". –  DeadMG May 29 '11 at 21:43
    
A "Pro" usually has the ability to have a game go their way in most situations. With a fair start or not, with the ability to balance out a game, it won't be a problem for them. –  Randomman159 May 31 '11 at 10:09
    
On the contrary, at a pro level, their skill levels are so even that map balance issues are more prominent than at an amateur level. –  Tor Valamo Oct 20 '11 at 0:06

In RTS games level design has to be ruled by RTS directives of concrete game. I don't know if exists public RTS papers level design for existing RTS. May be yes. Just try some Google. Google It

share|improve this answer
1  
I would love to know why you where down voted. –  DFectuoso Aug 10 '10 at 23:31
2  
We could answer every question on the site with "just google it". At that point we may as well just replace the entire site with a redirect to www.google.com. The intent is to make our answers generally more useful than a google search. –  ZorbaTHut Aug 13 '10 at 2:27
    
Also, his grasp of grammar is shaky at best, and that tends to lead to downvotes. –  ZorbaTHut Aug 13 '10 at 2:27
    
@ZorbaTHut - i'm sorry, i'm not native speaker. And for non concrete question? RTS is pretty large scale. –  samboush Aug 13 '10 at 14:05

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.